Skip to main content

Using Mental Resources



Mental Resources

The evidence continues to mount that as Jung suggested, our type is part of an organic human system and he was trying to use basic terms to describe complex processes.  He could not have been more explicit that his work was about the psychology of the types and not about describing the types themselves.  He noted that type was about the natural limits of perception and judgment because of the way human psychology works.  He said that is book was about the relationship of the individual to the world, people, places, and things.

As Jung described the functional types, he provided a general set of characteristics and spent a good deal of effort in describing the interplay with conscious and unconscious aspects of human awareness.  Two threads seem to be ignored that are central to the psychology of the types.

Thread one: the role of subject-object relations is central in understanding the psychology of each type.  In subject-object relations, an individual is so "captive" to a psychological function, he or she cannot simply be "free" from the force of the particular mental function in the way he or she operates in everyday life.  For example, an Introverted Sensing (Si) type isn't fully conscious of how Si directs action and influences perceptions and judgments, and further, when in the presence of Intuition, feels particularly uncomfortable with acknolwedging what it is and how it is useful.  Only through self-awareness can the Si (as is true of all eight functional types) begin to fully understand its "power" in one's psychological life.

Related to this principle is Jung's proposition that the resolution of the subject-object tension is through the transcendent function, which is a way of making the "function" an object of awareness which leads to productive choices in perception and judgment.  In other words, if I can learn how the eight functions operate in my own psychology, I am more likely to mindfully respond to situations rather than provide an automatic response.  For this reason, I wanted the Pearman Personality Integrator to provide information on all eight mental functions and the role of flexibility in the way an individual operates in life. You have to recognize, identify, manage, leverage, and learn from each function to manage the subject-object dynamic within the mental functions.

Thread two: psychology energy is essential in understanding the psychology of the types.  Energy is a finite source which can only be directed in so many ways at any given time.  "Consumers of energy" become an important variable to consider.  For example, if you easily use Extraverted Intuition (Ne) and it is expected in your current environment, you may find this renewing.  However, if  Ne isn't very natural to your use of mental energy and you are required and expected to display Ne, the tension may be energy depleting.  It is very important to know how this energy use is at play in an individual's life.  Shifting between functions (e.g., going from Ne to Si) may consume a considerable amount of mental energy.  And there isn't much doubt that living "intentionally" consumes considerable energy as you try to make choices such that you reduce the limits and increase the possibilities of perception and judgment.  The Pearman provides important clues in the key dimensions of flexibility (e.g. Rejuvenation) to get an understanding of what may be needed to appropriately restore psychological energy.        

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Brokers: A Point of View

Engaging. Informative. Speculative. Illuminating. Irritating. Thoughtful. Mistaken. These terms describe  Merve Emre’s new book, The Personality Brokers (in the US) and What’s Your Type? (in Australia and Europe), published by Doubleday.  Emre brilliantly used sources in multiple places to support her historical rendering of the family environment and passions of the mother-daughter duo who are responsible for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® assessment.  She managed to expose a host of attitudes, reflective of the time, and of the unique character of the individuals involved.   Emre’s real goal, however, is to use the popularity of the MBTI® tool to expose issues in the use of psychological tools in organizations.  She is right to point out that using personality based tools for selection and promotion is problematic and typically doesn’t end well for the individual or the organization.  Noting that individuals are being improperly evaluated from a self-report tool is precisely

A Judgment System: Thinking

Thinking—Logical, Analytical, and Outcome Oriented (or so the rumor goes) Ever wonder what all the fuss was about when it comes to being analytical?  Some folks are very basic in their use of thinking—-meaning they are quick to see gaps or problems and they think their job is done.  A more complex use of thinking is to begin with a perspective of multi-variate factors and exploring the underlying and intersecting systems in a situation.  It isn’t so much about finding the gaps as understanding the logic of factors, or as Jung put it, “following its own law s, [Thinking] brings the contents of ideation into conceptual connection with one another” (pp:830, page 481).  You have these ideas that you connect in a way that seems logical. Judging functions serve to provide a way to evaluate information and experiences so there is a basis for action or conclusion.  While the completeness and quality of all decisions begin with the kind of information that is used which the perceiving

What does empathy have to do with judgment? A look at the engine of judgment.

                                            What does empathy have to do with judgment?                                         A look at the engine of judgment: Thinking and Feeling. For many years I’ve had participants in psychological type workshops say to me, “How can Feeling be a rational judgment?”  “What does Feeling have to do with making decisions?”  “How is empathy related to making a choice or in judging something?”  When I’ve been with experienced long time consultant or facilitator users of psychological type assessments, I’ve asked the following and usually get silence in response:  “If Thinking is a rational judging process, how is Feeling rational?”  I’m willing to bet there are a number of readers of this blog who have had the same thoughts or questions, and have simply defaulted to, “that’s the model Jung put forth.”  Our perspective on this has a significant impact on how we present type to others and how we learn to use type processes productively. All of