Skip to main content

Flexibility and Development in Type

Centrality of Flexibility for Development

 Flexibility affects three dimensions of type development.  Flexing within the mental function (Si, Se, Ni, Ne, Te, Ti, Fe, Fi) allows for a deeper, richer utilization of the mental function.  Flexing across mental functions (Te shifting to Fe) in a situation indicates the individual has assessed the current situation and shifted to a more appropriate function.  Flexing between modalities of what feels natural to what is demonstrated due to the environmental press of a situation allows for managing tension and energy required for doing what feels uncomfortable.  Far too often, flexibility is thought of as important only as related to shifting from one mental function (Fe to Te) to another, which may be required from time to time.

For many years, type development was defined as knowing which function to use and using it in a given situation.  As evidence has been gathered over time, including enormous clinical experience, reveals that development is a good deal richer.

Flexing within a mental function means building the capacity to go from a simple use of the function to a more complex use of the function.  Consider the individual who Extraverts Thinking but does so at the most basic, elementary level.  This kind of Te is incomplete in its analysis and tends to be hyper critical, impatient with contradictory evidence and perspectives, and seems driven by a need to be "right".  A well rounded, more complex use of Te reflects a desire for multiple layers of analysis, seeks contradictory evidence and points of view, sees the number of variables as fluid, and a need to test assumptions.  Unless an individual is flexibly in the way he or she approaches the use of Te, they may not deepen their use of the function.

Flexing across mental functions is very important for an individual to learn, if he or she is able to respond to the demands of a situation appropriately.  Consider the individual who is dealing with a situation from the perspective of Te (Extraverted Thinking) and comes to the realization that the kind of approach that is needed is Ne (Extraverted Intuiting).  This is a move from analyzing for a decision or facilitating for new insights and perspectives.  Developing this kind of flexibility is essential to being more effective in leading and influencing others.

Flexing across modalities is complex as the individual needs to be aware of what feels natural and comfortable and what is being required in a given situation.  Imagine the Introverted Sensor (Si) who loves the comfort of verifying reliable information being asked to brainstorm, share ideas, find innovative new perspectives (Ne).  If this movement from what seems natural and at ease to what is required and quite different produces strain, managing that strain will be essential to having the psychological energy needed to flex.

Flexibility has a number of dimensions which I'll cover in a later entry. 

The Pearman Personality Integrator provides a FlexIndex which applies to all three dimensions outlined above.  Importantly, exploring the nature of flexibility and how it can be enriched for an individual has the direct consequence of contribution to type development.

Don't miss getting more information and learning how to use the Pearman.  Check the following MHS, Inc. training information.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Brokers: A Point of View

Engaging. Informative. Speculative. Illuminating. Irritating. Thoughtful. Mistaken. These terms describe  Merve Emre’s new book, The Personality Brokers (in the US) and What’s Your Type? (in Australia and Europe), published by Doubleday.  Emre brilliantly used sources in multiple places to support her historical rendering of the family environment and passions of the mother-daughter duo who are responsible for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® assessment.  She managed to expose a host of attitudes, reflective of the time, and of the unique character of the individuals involved.   Emre’s real goal, however, is to use the popularity of the MBTI® tool to expose issues in the use of psychological tools in organizations.  She is right to point out that using personality based tools for selection and promotion is problematic and typically doesn’t end well for the individual or the organization.  Noting that individuals are being improperly evaluated from a self-report tool is precisely
1 comment
Read more

A Judgment System: Thinking

Thinking—Logical, Analytical, and Outcome Oriented (or so the rumor goes) Ever wonder what all the fuss was about when it comes to being analytical?  Some folks are very basic in their use of thinking—-meaning they are quick to see gaps or problems and they think their job is done.  A more complex use of thinking is to begin with a perspective of multi-variate factors and exploring the underlying and intersecting systems in a situation.  It isn’t so much about finding the gaps as understanding the logic of factors, or as Jung put it, “following its own law s, [Thinking] brings the contents of ideation into conceptual connection with one another” (pp:830, page 481).  You have these ideas that you connect in a way that seems logical. Judging functions serve to provide a way to evaluate information and experiences so there is a basis for action or conclusion.  While the completeness and quality of all decisions begin with the kind of information that is used which the perceiving
Post a Comment
Read more

What does empathy have to do with judgment? A look at the engine of judgment.

                                            What does empathy have to do with judgment?                                         A look at the engine of judgment: Thinking and Feeling. For many years I’ve had participants in psychological type workshops say to me, “How can Feeling be a rational judgment?”  “What does Feeling have to do with making decisions?”  “How is empathy related to making a choice or in judging something?”  When I’ve been with experienced long time consultant or facilitator users of psychological type assessments, I’ve asked the following and usually get silence in response:  “If Thinking is a rational judging process, how is Feeling rational?”  I’m willing to bet there are a number of readers of this blog who have had the same thoughts or questions, and have simply defaulted to, “that’s the model Jung put forth.”  Our perspective on this has a significant impact on how we present type to others and how we learn to use type processes productively. All of
1 comment
Read more