Skip to main content

The Untethered Personality



Developing an Untethered Personality

Have you ever experienced arguing strongly for an issue and for what you called undeniable facts only later to discover you were entirely wrong?  Have you ever had an emotional reaction to a situation and you said or reacted in a way which was entirely out of your control and you later regretted?  Have you ever met someone for the first time and instantaneously greatly disliked (or liked) and had no rationale or explicit reason for the reaction? 

In each of these situations you experienced being “had” by a point of view, emotion, belief, or hunch.  When something “has” you, it is like being in a bubble such that you don’t take in other information or see other possibilities or options.  You are tethered to this reaction and perspective. The perspective, emotion, belief, or hunch controls your perceptions and reactions rather than you being in conscious control.  

In a profound way, your conscious self is the “subject” of the perspective, emotion, or hunch.  When these elements become “objects” of conscious awareness, they no longer have power or control over your reactions and feelings.  When these experiences are objects of understanding, you are free to interpret the experience differently and rather than reflexively react, you can adaptively select a response.

The richest form of this kind of adaptability is when  you see and understand multiple perspectives, the deep meaning of the psychological information in your emotions, and become ever more inclusive in your thinking and choices.  But to get here, you have to be self-aware of your reactions and perspectives and open to self-examination about what, why, and how you are thinking and seeing things as you are at the moment and consider how you might see and react that is constructive and healthy for yourself and others involved.
These reflexive (automatic) perspectives, emotions, beliefs, and hunches are useful in that you are not having to use a lot of energy to figure out how to respond.  These are often used reactions that have served you in the past.  In new situations, however, they may not serve you well at all.

From the framework of psychological type, each mental function (Se, Ne, Te, Fe, Si, Ni, Ti, Fi) serves a purpose.  Each provides for an efficient form of information or judgment.  Because of the need for individuals to efficiently process and act, each person is literally tethered to that specific form of perception and judgment, whatever it happens to be.  When Jung noted that it is our type which “determines and limits judgments”, he had this very human dynamic in mind.

This automatic dynamic is not inherently bad, just limiting until and unless we realize that this is a starting point of understanding and decision-making.  We need to be able to identify how each of these functions play into our individual psychology, which the Pearman Personality Integrator is designed to do.  By clarifying what is comfortable and demonstrated among your mental functions as defined by type, you are able to gain a greater control of a full range of ways of perceiving and reflect on and use a full range of judging processes.

For example if you are an individual who is very comfortable and frequently uses Introverted Sensing (Si) for information and Extraverted Thinking for making decisions (Te), and you are not able to flex among mental functions to explore other ways of seeing things or considering options, you miss a tremendous amount of valuable information and your decisions will have limited impact.  The Pearman allows you to get a handle on awareness and use of all perceiving and judging processes and insight into the role of flexibility in your personality.  

In short, the Pearman gives you a way to untether your reliance on patterns by gaining greater utility of all of your mental functions and increasing your flexibility to enhance adapting to challenges and enriching individual well-being.  Consider each of the gifts of the eight functions—and what each ignores:

Se focuses on the here and now, ignoring what was and what is potential.
Ne generates possibilities, ignoring concrete reality and constraints.
Si drives for reliable ad verified details, ignoring patterns and possible connections.
Ni sees scenarios and imagine’s what can be, ignoring what is immediate and present.
Te argues for fixing the gaps in analysis, ignoring consequences on others.
Fe empathizes, ignoring likely and probable options which could be uncomfortable.
Ti analyzes the pros and cons, ignoring personal meaning and ideals in a situation.
Fi pushes for framing situations through values and ideals, ignoring the logic of a situation.

And with the Pearman FlexIndex, you can explore the ways an individual can explore how to enrich flexibility.  The five dimensions of flexibility include: Proactivity, Composure, Variety Seeking, Connectivity, and Rejuvenation.

Your task is nothing less that realizing how to use these mental processes in a judicious way.  You begin with your “home base” or your automatic reactions realizing these are starting points rather than ending points.  You cannot develop and use what you have not identified and understood.  The Pearman allows you to identify, clarify, and engage your psychological resources, and to grasp the range of flexibility required to be an untethered self.

Learn more at:  https://tap.mhs.com/pearman.aspx


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Brokers: A Point of View

Engaging. Informative. Speculative. Illuminating. Irritating. Thoughtful. Mistaken. These terms describe  Merve Emre’s new book, The Personality Brokers (in the US) and What’s Your Type? (in Australia and Europe), published by Doubleday.  Emre brilliantly used sources in multiple places to support her historical rendering of the family environment and passions of the mother-daughter duo who are responsible for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® assessment.  She managed to expose a host of attitudes, reflective of the time, and of the unique character of the individuals involved.   Emre’s real goal, however, is to use the popularity of the MBTI® tool to expose issues in the use of psychological tools in organizations.  She is right to point out that using personality based tools for selection and promotion is problematic and typically doesn’t end well for the individual or the organization.  Noting that individuals are being improperly evaluated from a self-report tool is precisely

A Judgment System: Thinking

Thinking—Logical, Analytical, and Outcome Oriented (or so the rumor goes) Ever wonder what all the fuss was about when it comes to being analytical?  Some folks are very basic in their use of thinking—-meaning they are quick to see gaps or problems and they think their job is done.  A more complex use of thinking is to begin with a perspective of multi-variate factors and exploring the underlying and intersecting systems in a situation.  It isn’t so much about finding the gaps as understanding the logic of factors, or as Jung put it, “following its own law s, [Thinking] brings the contents of ideation into conceptual connection with one another” (pp:830, page 481).  You have these ideas that you connect in a way that seems logical. Judging functions serve to provide a way to evaluate information and experiences so there is a basis for action or conclusion.  While the completeness and quality of all decisions begin with the kind of information that is used which the perceiving

What does empathy have to do with judgment? A look at the engine of judgment.

                                            What does empathy have to do with judgment?                                         A look at the engine of judgment: Thinking and Feeling. For many years I’ve had participants in psychological type workshops say to me, “How can Feeling be a rational judgment?”  “What does Feeling have to do with making decisions?”  “How is empathy related to making a choice or in judging something?”  When I’ve been with experienced long time consultant or facilitator users of psychological type assessments, I’ve asked the following and usually get silence in response:  “If Thinking is a rational judging process, how is Feeling rational?”  I’m willing to bet there are a number of readers of this blog who have had the same thoughts or questions, and have simply defaulted to, “that’s the model Jung put forth.”  Our perspective on this has a significant impact on how we present type to others and how we learn to use type processes productively. All of