Skip to main content

A Few Links between Flexibility and Development

I believe that type development requires flexibility.  Any enrichment of flexibility has the residual of building capability for type development. The ability to flex from what is comfortable to what may be required was the only definition that others have offered and has been repeated many times. The often repeated statement is that type development is knowing which function to use and using it.  But to do so requires flexibility.

A second element of development is flexing between functions and attitudes.  Such that the individual who is constantly reliant on, say, Extraverted Thinking learns that a particular situation may really call upon Introverted Intuiting and she flexes to achieve that shift from judgment to perception.  This requires awareness of the nature of the functions, the impact of the functions, and the capability to select the function that will achieve a desired outcome.  So if you really want to develop a greater resource in your Introverted Intuiting (Ni), you need to learn as much about this mental resource and its utility as possible.

A third element of development is the enrichment of the functions themselves.  Jung wrote about the concrete and abstract dimensions of the mental functions, and the way he wrote about these things, it is somewhat confusing as some have interpreted his comments regarding how extraversion drives concreteness and introversion drives abstraction.  I think it goes deeper.  

Many people do not develop their functions in a complex manner.  Sadly, many individuals learn about their preference and the typical description and the exploration stops.  Many—keeping with the example above—people who Extravert Thinking seem to believe that being critical and logical is sufficient, when in fact, that is a basic and elementary expression of the function.  In its fullness, deeply enriched, Extraverted Thinking begins with the assumptions of multivariate explanations and causes, is more driven in pursuit of hypotheses about deep structures than conclusions, and is profoundly elegant in seeing and articulating complex principles.

To develop functions in a complex manner requires you to become a student of your own psychological type system—that is, the nature of your current use of the eight functions.  You also have to understand that the development of each function requires different experiences and insights for each function.  In a very real sense, you go from seeing and using your mental functions (Si, Se, Ni,Ne, Ti,Te, Fi, Fe) as simple instrumental ways of perceiving and judging to complex inter-related systems of information and processing.  This is when—for example—Introverted Sensing (Si) goes from being focused on repeatable, verifiable information to understanding the structure of information itself with its own integrity, which is like going from a photograph to a Georgia O’keefe painting such as Black Place I or Sky Above Clouds IV.  

Each of the eight functions serve us in very different ways, and the more we learn about how it serves us, the greater our appreciation for its power in our lives and its potential for enriching our choices.

Does this resonate?  What is your reaction and thought?

What I hope the Pearman Personality Integrator does is initiate the personal journey of discovery. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Brokers: A Point of View

Engaging. Informative. Speculative. Illuminating. Irritating. Thoughtful. Mistaken. These terms describe  Merve Emre’s new book, The Personality Brokers (in the US) and What’s Your Type? (in Australia and Europe), published by Doubleday.  Emre brilliantly used sources in multiple places to support her historical rendering of the family environment and passions of the mother-daughter duo who are responsible for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® assessment.  She managed to expose a host of attitudes, reflective of the time, and of the unique character of the individuals involved.   Emre’s real goal, however, is to use the popularity of the MBTI® tool to expose issues in the use of psychological tools in organizations.  She is right to point out that using personality based tools for selection and promotion is problematic and typically doesn’t end well for the individual or the organization.  Noting that individuals are being improperly evaluated from a self-report tool is precisely

A Judgment System: Thinking

Thinking—Logical, Analytical, and Outcome Oriented (or so the rumor goes) Ever wonder what all the fuss was about when it comes to being analytical?  Some folks are very basic in their use of thinking—-meaning they are quick to see gaps or problems and they think their job is done.  A more complex use of thinking is to begin with a perspective of multi-variate factors and exploring the underlying and intersecting systems in a situation.  It isn’t so much about finding the gaps as understanding the logic of factors, or as Jung put it, “following its own law s, [Thinking] brings the contents of ideation into conceptual connection with one another” (pp:830, page 481).  You have these ideas that you connect in a way that seems logical. Judging functions serve to provide a way to evaluate information and experiences so there is a basis for action or conclusion.  While the completeness and quality of all decisions begin with the kind of information that is used which the perceiving

What does empathy have to do with judgment? A look at the engine of judgment.

                                            What does empathy have to do with judgment?                                         A look at the engine of judgment: Thinking and Feeling. For many years I’ve had participants in psychological type workshops say to me, “How can Feeling be a rational judgment?”  “What does Feeling have to do with making decisions?”  “How is empathy related to making a choice or in judging something?”  When I’ve been with experienced long time consultant or facilitator users of psychological type assessments, I’ve asked the following and usually get silence in response:  “If Thinking is a rational judging process, how is Feeling rational?”  I’m willing to bet there are a number of readers of this blog who have had the same thoughts or questions, and have simply defaulted to, “that’s the model Jung put forth.”  Our perspective on this has a significant impact on how we present type to others and how we learn to use type processes productively. All of