Skip to main content

A Thoughtful Journey: An Introduction

Carl Jung created a remarkable library of books, letters, and lectures.  If you have read any of his work and feel he is sometimes simply "too far out there," you are not alone.  During his life he had the luxury of time for reading the great books, engaging in massive letter writing, seeing clients or working in a clinical setting, and seemingly able to travel, write, and present endlessly.  He was nothing less than an acute observer of culture, history as manifest in literature, and master of synthesizing information both current and from the past which led him to propose inventive ways of thinking about the human experience.

I think many readers of Jung miss the mark when they forget the intellectual culture in which his work was embedded and his simple proposition that he was sharing his journey.  His writings are not particularly straightforward--complicated as well by being translated into English.  His ideas are often esoteric. It is easy to see why his family prevented for decades the publication of The Red Book, perhaps the most intimate imagery book of his imagination.

While many in the scientific community mock or attempt to dimish the depth and range of his way of seeing life and understanding human beings, there are increasingly robust scientific findings that confirm many of his propositions.  For example, he proposed that the unconscious was the most powerful force in guiding how we interpret and act on life experiences.  It is commonplace to read neuroscientists declare that the "decision" you think you've made was made by unconscious mechanisms for you before you even thought about the choices in front of you.  Jung proposed that the imagination was more powerful than sensory reality testing in motivating and changing behavior. Simply consider how powerful a movie is in triggering emotions,  arousing sexual interest, and prompting thoughts about how to behave in the future.

If you are reading this blog entry, you have decided to join me on a careful reading of Jung's Psychological Types, Volume 6 of his collective works.  I have proposed that we take one chapter a month to explore what Jung meant, what it may mean to us, and how we can use his propositions to enrich our lives.

As a co-learner in this journey, try to approach the work with fresh eyes.  Ponder that he was attempting to provide a perspective for understanding the human experience using the evidence that was available to him.  It is not accidental that he relies on symbols and mythology to make his points.  Many of the symbols and mythologies seem distant to us today so we are required to simply step back and read the story as given by a storyteller.

In the one hour of our each of our future discussions, we need to be prepared to be concise, and to share thoughtfully our reactions and how these inform our considerations for moving forward.  

I am going to create a blog page for each chapter. PLEASE use these blog pages to share things you didn't get to during our sessions, reflections that came after the session, or questions you want to explore.

Thanks for coming on this thoughtful journey.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Brokers: A Point of View

Engaging. Informative. Speculative. Illuminating. Irritating. Thoughtful. Mistaken. These terms describe  Merve Emre’s new book, The Personality Brokers (in the US) and What’s Your Type? (in Australia and Europe), published by Doubleday.  Emre brilliantly used sources in multiple places to support her historical rendering of the family environment and passions of the mother-daughter duo who are responsible for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® assessment.  She managed to expose a host of attitudes, reflective of the time, and of the unique character of the individuals involved.   Emre’s real goal, however, is to use the popularity of the MBTI® tool to expose issues in the use of psychological tools in organizations.  She is right to point out that using personality based tools for selection and promotion is problematic and typically doesn’t end well for the individual or the organization.  Noting that individuals are being improperly evaluated from a self-report tool is precisely

A Judgment System: Thinking

Thinking—Logical, Analytical, and Outcome Oriented (or so the rumor goes) Ever wonder what all the fuss was about when it comes to being analytical?  Some folks are very basic in their use of thinking—-meaning they are quick to see gaps or problems and they think their job is done.  A more complex use of thinking is to begin with a perspective of multi-variate factors and exploring the underlying and intersecting systems in a situation.  It isn’t so much about finding the gaps as understanding the logic of factors, or as Jung put it, “following its own law s, [Thinking] brings the contents of ideation into conceptual connection with one another” (pp:830, page 481).  You have these ideas that you connect in a way that seems logical. Judging functions serve to provide a way to evaluate information and experiences so there is a basis for action or conclusion.  While the completeness and quality of all decisions begin with the kind of information that is used which the perceiving

What does empathy have to do with judgment? A look at the engine of judgment.

                                            What does empathy have to do with judgment?                                         A look at the engine of judgment: Thinking and Feeling. For many years I’ve had participants in psychological type workshops say to me, “How can Feeling be a rational judgment?”  “What does Feeling have to do with making decisions?”  “How is empathy related to making a choice or in judging something?”  When I’ve been with experienced long time consultant or facilitator users of psychological type assessments, I’ve asked the following and usually get silence in response:  “If Thinking is a rational judging process, how is Feeling rational?”  I’m willing to bet there are a number of readers of this blog who have had the same thoughts or questions, and have simply defaulted to, “that’s the model Jung put forth.”  Our perspective on this has a significant impact on how we present type to others and how we learn to use type processes productively. All of