Skip to main content

Leadership is the Art of Microinteractions

A number of leadership oriented thinkers suggest that the fundamentals of leadership mean that an individual has articulated a direction, facilitated alignment of perspectives and resources with that vision, and motivated others to work in a committed fashion to realize that vision.  And when you ask the next question--what does direction, alignment, and commitment really look like?--you open Pandora's box of potential solutions.  
Regardless of the "big" answer, the "small" answer resides in how leaders attend to their everyday interactions with others and with their environment (and by that I mean how they use symbols to influence the psychological environment). The smallest of interactions with your employees, peers, team members, or stakeholders can have an enormous influence on how they perceive you as a leader -- and help you reach your business's goals.  I've used the following example a number of times to make this point.
As 49-year-old Cara stepped out of her car, she noticed an employee was having trouble carrying a variety of bags from his car to the building. Cara approached the employee saying, "Good morning! I see that you've got your hands full; I've got a free hand, let me help." The employee was immediately grateful but declared that he would take care of it. Cara responded with, "At least let me take one of these bags to the front desk to save you some of the trouble." She picked up a bag and started walking with the employee to the front of the building. She casually noted, "Looks like a department party. Something special today?" The employee said, "Some new employees are starting today and the facilities staff wants to welcome them." "Great news," Cara said, "We're growing."
Cara left the bag at the front desk and while walking to her office she spoke to each person she met along the way. Her comments were usually something like: "Hey Joe, I hear we'll get to see your project report later," or "Hey Diane, I haven't seen you for awhile; I hope that everything is fine." As she made her way to her office, she interacted with every person, making each interaction brief and direct. Each time she addressed the person by name, asked a supportive question, and often invited the individual to let her know how things were going.
Total time investment in each interaction: eight seconds. Return on effort: employee loyalty, trust, and a flow of information that every manager desperately wants and needs to make intelligent personnel decisions.
Cara is the vice president of marketing in a $200 million dollar financial services company. She is known throughout the organization as an impeccably dressed, energetic leader.
Of the 67 established manager and leader competencies for success and the 19 behavior clusters linked to career failure or derailment, the vast majority of behaviors are related to the management of relationships. Among career stallers, 75% of the behaviors are relationship issues (e.g. arrogance, betrayal of trust, defensiveness). All of these behaviors are connected to our most basic interactions. These behaviors are aspects of emotional intelligence, which leaders can learn to more effectively access and use.
Relationships are built through micro-interactions. Each interaction has one of two possible outcomes: You are seen as either inviting -- or as cold and indifferent. After a period of time, and through numerous moments of potential interactions, the cold and indifferent are usually thought of as self-interested, too absorbed, and generally uninterested in others' contributions.
Those leaders with a long list of inviting interactions usually have more latitude and more options when working with others. The perception is that you are invested in others and that you recognize that your success is tied to the work of others in the organization. Everyone feels like they are in the same boat, pulling the oars in the same direction.
To be sure, leadership is a combination of vision, business smarts, persistence, and a commitment to realizing the vision through people's efforts. But the single most important and simplest aspect of leadership is working with others and getting their commitment -- rather than just compliance -- to work effectively toward goals and objectives.
Make the most out of every interaction, no matter how small you might think it to be. Each interaction is an opportunity to recognize others, which communicates to them that they are significant to the organization. Asking a general inviting question shows you have some confidence in their work. Suggesting that you are willing to help communicates you see them as worthwhile.
At the end of Cara's day, she dropped an e-mail to the manager of facilities: "I heard you had a welcoming party today. I hope it went well and that the new members of the team are excited to be here." Is there any wonder why everyone I interviewed about the senior team of this company made the opening statement: "Now about Cara, I would walk through hell for that woman. She's the most remarkable business person I've ever worked with."
Leadership is building capacity and commitment through building relationships. And just like a brick house, built one brick at a time, relationships that matter are built through micro-interactions. How strong is your relationship house?
And even though we can recount this story many times---and I have--we come back to the realization that if it was easy, we would already be doing it.  It is not easy in part because we may not be self-aware of our habits of mind or habitual behaviors that undermine our efforts.  It is not easy because we might say attending to interactions this way is important but we have an excuse for relying on our Door A (Automatic) responses such as "I'm under a time constraint so it is hard to be nice right now." It is more likely that there is a missing awareness of both what kinds of behaviors are available and what is required to flex.
Ellen Van Velsor, researcher at the Center for Creative Leadership, has often pointed out that individuals have to believe they have the capacity to do something before they are willing to do it.  One of the goals I have for the Pearman Personality Integrator is that each individual will learn of his or her full range of capabilities as noted by the mental functions (Si, Ni, Te, Fi, etc) and what is required to flex (e.g. proactivity, composure, openness to variety, etc).  In learning about these resources, individuals may decide to stretch and grow.  The focus of the report is to invite individuals to think about their personal intelligence--who they are, what others are capable of, and decide on a course of action that benefits all.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personality Brokers: A Point of View

Engaging. Informative. Speculative. Illuminating. Irritating. Thoughtful. Mistaken. These terms describe  Merve Emre’s new book, The Personality Brokers (in the US) and What’s Your Type? (in Australia and Europe), published by Doubleday.  Emre brilliantly used sources in multiple places to support her historical rendering of the family environment and passions of the mother-daughter duo who are responsible for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® assessment.  She managed to expose a host of attitudes, reflective of the time, and of the unique character of the individuals involved.   Emre’s real goal, however, is to use the popularity of the MBTI® tool to expose issues in the use of psychological tools in organizations.  She is right to point out that using personality based tools for selection and promotion is problematic and typically doesn’t end well for the individual or the organization.  Noting that individuals are being improperly evaluated from a self-report tool is precisely

A Judgment System: Thinking

Thinking—Logical, Analytical, and Outcome Oriented (or so the rumor goes) Ever wonder what all the fuss was about when it comes to being analytical?  Some folks are very basic in their use of thinking—-meaning they are quick to see gaps or problems and they think their job is done.  A more complex use of thinking is to begin with a perspective of multi-variate factors and exploring the underlying and intersecting systems in a situation.  It isn’t so much about finding the gaps as understanding the logic of factors, or as Jung put it, “following its own law s, [Thinking] brings the contents of ideation into conceptual connection with one another” (pp:830, page 481).  You have these ideas that you connect in a way that seems logical. Judging functions serve to provide a way to evaluate information and experiences so there is a basis for action or conclusion.  While the completeness and quality of all decisions begin with the kind of information that is used which the perceiving

What does empathy have to do with judgment? A look at the engine of judgment.

                                            What does empathy have to do with judgment?                                         A look at the engine of judgment: Thinking and Feeling. For many years I’ve had participants in psychological type workshops say to me, “How can Feeling be a rational judgment?”  “What does Feeling have to do with making decisions?”  “How is empathy related to making a choice or in judging something?”  When I’ve been with experienced long time consultant or facilitator users of psychological type assessments, I’ve asked the following and usually get silence in response:  “If Thinking is a rational judging process, how is Feeling rational?”  I’m willing to bet there are a number of readers of this blog who have had the same thoughts or questions, and have simply defaulted to, “that’s the model Jung put forth.”  Our perspective on this has a significant impact on how we present type to others and how we learn to use type processes productively. All of